Drawing for KILT

USPTO serial 79012224

KILT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3272493Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KILT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet F. Sattertliwaite

JANET F SATTERTIWAITE VENABLE575 7TH ST NWWAHSINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, scotch whisky and scotch-whisky based liqueurs produced in ScotlandSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 3, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 19, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 7, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 7, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 19, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 27, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 26, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 31, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 15, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 25, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 9, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance