Drawing for RUF

USPTO serial 79012253

RUF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3095891Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 23, 2006
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MAX VERN

MAX VERN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, [ cabinets, ] beds, [ mirrors, picture frames, ] mattresses, duckboards, not of metal; cushions [ chests of drawers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
024[ Bed clothes, covers for cushions, eiderdowns; covers for mattresses, coverlets, quilts ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 1, 2025DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2025DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 6, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 13, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 13, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 30, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 30, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 28, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 15, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 15, 2012C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jun 15, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 5, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Apr 5, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 24, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 23, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance