USPTO serial 79012265
LEITZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3423037Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2008
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with LEITZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | [ manually-operated tools and equipment, namely, scissors and hand operated sharpening tools ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | [ CD storage racks ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | goods of paper and cardboard, namely, labels not of textiles; [ stickers; advertisement boards of paper or cardboard; ] paper and cardboard covers for documents and reports; [ sealing machines for offices; adhesive tape dispenser for office use; electromotive paper hole punches for office use; drawing boards; binding machines for loose leaves and ] [ punching machines for office use; ] [ account books, accounting books, ] signature books, display books; [ catalogs in the field of office machines; pamphlets in the field of office machines; handbooks in the field of office machines; manually operated and electric document binding machines for office use; manually operated and electric punching and document binding machines for office use; ] manually operated [ and electric ] punches for punching holes in paper; [ manually operated, electric and thermal document binding machines and accessories for office use, namely, binder spines of paper, wire and plastic, binder strips, filing strips, book covers, front and back covers, ] [ thermal folders of plastic and transparent film ] [, thermal bound folders and hot seal document binding machines for office use ] ; filing, indexing, presentation and signature folders; paper covered and plastic ring binders with metal mechanism; ring binders and folders of cardboard; document folders; document files; document and letter files; preprinted and unprinted labels and file spine labels of paper; [ desk files, not of leather; file away folders; filing index books; ] transparent sleeves for protecting documents; [ file indexes in the nature of index cards; ] hanging document files; [ swing document files; ] [ hanging pouches of paper; ] [ hanging guide filing cards; paper identification tabs; ] punches; staplers; letter trays; filing boxes for use in the office; filing containers for use in the office; [ printed teaching and instruction material in the field of office machines; manually operated and electric laminating machines for office use and ] laminating materials and accessories for office use, namely, laminate pouches and protectors [, clips and chains for plastic-film pouches and photo punches ] ; [ stand up document holders; ] [ desk tidies, namely, desk top organizers; desk blotters and desk pads; ] letter trays of plastic [ ; pen trays ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ shelves; mounting racks for computer hardware; ] [ storage racks for files; ] goods of plastic, namely, plastic crates for filing documents and plastic boxes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Esselte IPR AB
- Other trademarks owned by Esselte IPR AB
- Other trademarks owned by Esselte IPR AB
- Other trademarks owned by LEITZ ACCO Brands GmbH & Co KG
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named LEITZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 8, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 6, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 21, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 17, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |