USPTO serial 79012419
INTRUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTRUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
CN
Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
CN
Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
CN
Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sean Patrick Suiter
Indhira A. LaPuma Suiter Swantz pc llo14301 FNB Parkway, Suite 220Omaha, NE 68154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, DISHES, GLASS STORAGE JARS; PAINTED BEVERAGE GLASSWARE, PAINTED DISHES, PAINTED BOTTLES SOLD EMPTY, AND PAINTED GLASS JARS USED FOR STORAGE; FIGURINES MADE OF PORCELAIN, TERRA-COTTA OR GLASS; STATUETTES MADE OF PORCELAIN, TERRA-COTTA OR GLASS; CHINA ORNAMENTS, CHINA DISHES, GLASS STORAGE JARS, JUGS, KETTLES, BOWLS, POTS; DRINKING VESSELS, BEER MUGS, DRINKING GLASSES, GLASS CAPS | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
- Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
- Other trademarks owned by ZIBO YICHEN QINGGONG ZHIPIN YOUXIAN GONGSI
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named INTRUE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 1, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |