USPTO serial 79012428
URSUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3136022Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with URSUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer J. Millones
Jennifer J. Millones DIAGEO NORTH AMERICA, INC.801 MAIN AVENUENORWALK, CT 06851-1127UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by URSUS VODKA HOLDING N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named URSUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2015 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2013 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | C7P. | CANCELLED SEC. 7 - PARTIAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | C7PF | RQST FOR SECT 7 PARTIAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |