Drawing for SANOTINT

USPTO serial 79012429

SANOTINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3251897Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 12, 2007
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with SANOTINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

1700 Diagonal RoadSuite 505Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Products for the treatment and the care of the hair namely, hair dyes, hair colouring creams, hair lighteners, hair highlights, hair shampoos, hair creams, hair lotions, hair cleansing oils, hair protective oils, hair calming oils, hair conditioners, hair sprays, hair lacquers, hair gels, hair mousse, hair balsamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2026REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 16, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 15, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 26, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 26, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 16, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 16, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 4, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2009RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 25, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 21, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 17, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 1, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance