USPTO serial 79012437
GLEN GRANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3378772Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2008
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with GLEN GRANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IT
IT
The Glenlivet Distillers Limited
GB
Glen Grant Whisky Company Limited
GB
NL
DAVIDE CAMPARI - MILANO S.p.A.
I-20121 Milano, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Feldman
Joel R. Feldman Greenberg Traurig, LLP3333 Piedmont Rd. NE, Suite 2500ATLANTA, GA 30305UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Whisky | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GLEN GRANT S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by GLEN GRANT S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by The Glenlivet Distillers Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Glen Grant Whisky Company Limited
- Other trademarks owned by DAVIDE CAMPARI - MILANO N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DAVIDE CAMPARI - MILANO S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named GLEN GRANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2013 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 5, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 21, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |