Drawing for AYK

USPTO serial 79012438

AYK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AYK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics, namely lipsticks, sun care lipstick, body lotions, sun creams, after sun creams, pre-sun creamsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigerating, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes, namely solariums, high pressure lamps, UV tubesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
044Taning studios and beauty salons; medical services; hygienic and beauty care for human beingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 21, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 12, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 22, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 22, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance