Drawing for O.M.C.E. ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE CIEGOS EUROPEOS

USPTO serial 79012457

O.M.C.E. ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE CIEGOS EUROPEOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3114482Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 11, 2006
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with O.M.C.E. ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE CIEGOS EUROPEOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jose M Arrufat Gracia

Jose Maria Arrufat Gracia Arrufat Gracia, PLLC130 West 42nd Street Suite 705New York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, namely, laundry soap, laundry starch, laundry bleach; general purpose cleaning, polishing, scouring, and abrasive liquids and powders; emery boards; soaps for personal use and household use; perfumery, essential oils for household use and personal use, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 14, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 28, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 26, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Oct 9, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 13, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 16, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 16, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance