USPTO serial 79012483
LEO LINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEO LINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher
LEOLINER FAHRZEUG-BAU GMBHSPINNEREISTRAßE 13, 04179 LEIPZIGGERMAN DEMOCRATICGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Rail vehicles, namely passenger carriages, trains and structural parts therefore | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Leipziger Verkehrsbetriebe (LVB) GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by HeiterBlick GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by LEOLINER Fahrzeug-Bau GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named LEO LINER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2014 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2014 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 13, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |