Drawing for ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS

USPTO serial 79012554

ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SINGLETON, RUDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTAVIS CREATING VALUE IN PHARMACEUTICALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEOFFREY M. MCNUTT

GEOFFREY M. MCNUTT MCNUTT LAW2200 CLARENDON BLVDARLINGTON COURTHOUSE PLZ I, STE 1400-AARLINGTON, VA 22201-3379

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Housemark for a full line of pharmaceutical preparations; housemark for a full line of generic pharmaceutical preparations; medicated skin lotions, medicated shampoosSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 20, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Aug 3, 2013RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 9, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 5, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2012RHRDRESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2009EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 31, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 29, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 29, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 28, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 11, 2008RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 1, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 12, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance