Drawing for VISTA DECOR

USPTO serial 79012608

VISTA DECOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISTA DECOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Bins of wood or plastic; water pipe valves of plastic; mirrors; picture frames; plaited rattan except shoes, hats, matting and cushions; plaited straw except shoes, hats, matting and cushions; craftworks of bamboo or wood; bead curtains for decoration; craftworks of resin, decorations of plastic for foodstuffs; coathooks not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 16, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 26, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 28, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance