Drawing for OMASA

USPTO serial 79012631

OMASA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3168891Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 7, 2006
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OMASA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LJUNGDAHL Charlotta

LJUNGDAHL Charlotta AIR LIQUIDE2700 Post Oak BlvdSuite 1800HOUSTON, TX 77056

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sanitary sterilizing preparations for medical and surgical apparatus and instrumentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Sterilization services for medical and surgical equipment and instruments; air and water disinfection servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Provision of training in the fight against nosocomial infectionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Chemical, biochemical, biological and bacteriological research and analysis services for the fight against nosocomial infectionsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
044Hospital servicesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 21, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 27, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 27, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 2, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 7, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 7, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 7, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 23, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance