CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WHEAT MAX

USPTO serial 79012642

WHEAT MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3242577Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 15, 2007
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHEAT MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bassam N. Ibrahim

RESEARCH ORGANISATION LIMESTONE AVE CAMPBELLAUSTRALIA CAPITAL TERRITORY 2612COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL,

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Vitamins, minerals and vitamin-mineral compositions, all being pharmaceutical preparationsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
030Flour preparations, namely, pasta, breakfast cereals, bread, biscuits, cakes and pastries made from processed cereals; flour made from processed cerealsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
031Agricultural, horticultural, and forestry products, namely, unprocessed grains; seeds, namely, seeds for agricultural and horticultural purposes; animal feed, namely, seeds for animal consumption, seeds for human consumption; unprocessed grains, including genetically modified grainsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2015UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Oct 23, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 23, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 19, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 1, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 23, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 23, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 15, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 18, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance