Drawing for J'SEXTE

USPTO serial 79012675

J'SEXTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3165410Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 31, 2006
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with J'SEXTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

FRANCESCO BRAGA

FRANCESCO BRAGA PERANI & PARTNERS S.P.A.PIAZZA SAN BABILA 5MILANO,ITALY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003[ Non-medicated toiletries, perfumes, ] eau de parfum, [ eau de cologne, ] eau de toilette [ essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, hair care preparations, soaps for personal use, shower gel, bath gel, shower foams, bathfoam, bath salts, body lotions, skin lotions, aftershave lotions, shaving foams, shaving soaps, deodorants for personal use, antiperspirants ]SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 21, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 26, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 17, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 17, 2013NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
May 17, 201371AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2013ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 4, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 5, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 21, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Oct 20, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 20, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 30, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance