Drawing for VIAGUARA

USPTO serial 79012755

VIAGUARA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3194358Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 2, 2007
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIAGUARA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

F. Christopher Austin

F CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN KOLESAR & LEATHAM400 SOUTH RAMPART BOULEVARDSUITE 400LAS VEGAS, NV 89145

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, brandy, prepared alcoholic cocktails, liqueurs, rum, whisky, wine, vodkaSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 9, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 11, 2013CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2013DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 30, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 31, 2012WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Aug 31, 2012WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2009PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 2, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 14, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 17, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 22, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 1, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 31, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance