USPTO serial 79012760
BITTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3318391Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- LEWIS, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BITTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SHANDONG BITTEL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG BITTEL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Shandong Bittel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
CN
Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bharati Bakshani
Bharati Bakshani LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018-3703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telephones; computers; facsimile machines; radio telephony sets comprised of telephone transmitters, receivers for telephone, telephone headsets, magnetic telephone wires, cases for telephones; computer hardware, namely, microprocessors; electronic pocket translators; notebook computers; video-telephones; automatic switching apparatus for telecommunication; television sets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHANDONG BITTEL ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
- Other trademarks owned by Shandong Bittel Electronics Company of Yankuang Group
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BITTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2021 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 26, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 24, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |