Drawing for S.O.S. BONBONS

USPTO serial 79012796

S.O.S. BONBONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with S.O.S. BONBONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Ableman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030candy, not sweetened and not for medical useSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 13, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 8, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 29, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance