Drawing for IVAR

USPTO serial 79012809

IVAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3071277Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 21, 2006
Examiner
BRODY, DANIEL S
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IVAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN P. MURTAUGH

JOHN P MURTAUGH PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metallic pipes and tubes for liquids; water-pipes of metal; metallic pipe fittings for plumbing and heating systems; metal valves for plumbing and heating systems; metal valves for drain pipes, ball valves, check valves and stop valves; connecting pieces for pipes, of metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Water injection, mixing and distributing systems for plumbing and heating devices, namely, plumbing and heating systems composed primarily of tubes, pipes and pre-assembled manifolds through which cold or low temperature water circulates; plumbing fittings, namely, valves, thermostatic valves, and manifoldsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
019Non-metallic water pipes; non-metallic pipe valvesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 22, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 14, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 28, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 24, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2007FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 26, 2006FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 26, 2006FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 19, 2006FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 21, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 30, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance