Drawing for ADAMANT

USPTO serial 79012846

ADAMANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3612505Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2009
Examiner
BLANE, SUZANNE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADAMANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN L. BAKER

STEPHEN L. BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28RARITAN, NJ 08869UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines, namely, machines for treating and coating surfaces, namely, silicon and ceramics, carbon and graphite, metals and alloys, hard metal and carbides, glasses and quartz, all for fabrication of systems for water treatment, water sensing, electrolysis for oxidation and reduction of components present in aqueous solutions; machines for treating and coating silicon, ceramic, carbon, graphite, metal, metal alloy, hard metal, carbide, glass and quartz surfaces, for fabrication of microsystems and microtechnique systems, namely, microelectrodes as component for electrochemical sensors or metrology sensors in micro- and nanotechnology; electrical and electronic controls as parts of the above mentioned machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Scientific electronic weighing, measuring and analytic apparatus for non-medical use, namely, water treatment, water disinfection, water analysis; electrochemical apparatus, namely, electrochemical oxygen monitors and sensors for environmental use, electrodes, namely, those used for water treatment and chemical synthesis; sensors for the detection of oxidants, disinfectants, metals, oxygen, micro-organisms, mineral salts, and all other compounds in water or gas or solvents; electrochemical sensors for the detection of oxidants, disinfectants, metal, oxygen, micro-organisms, mineral salts, and all other compounds in waterSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 28, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 10, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 21, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 2, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 31, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 1, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 23, 2008ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 4, 2008PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 18, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 17, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 22, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2006RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance