Drawing for NERIO

USPTO serial 79012856

NERIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NERIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Apparatus for levitating water and colloidalizing mixtures of liquids and solids, namely, receptacles, power driven pumps, power driven mixers, valves, mixer and pump speed controls and conduits sold as complete units in this classSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 8, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 10, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 4, 2006NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance