Drawing for M-BRACE

USPTO serial 79012901

M-BRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3148930Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 26, 2006
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with M-BRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeannine A Rittenhouse

Jeannine A Rittenhouse IpHorgan Ltd.1130 Lake Cook RoadSuite 240Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Artificial limbs, eyes and teeth; [ orthopedic articles, namely, supports and braces for articulations and for the spine; ] suturesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 2, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 29, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 29, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Sep 16, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 11, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 11, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2013ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2013LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jan 16, 2013COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 16, 2013PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Dec 29, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 26, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 4, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 18, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 8, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 16, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance