Drawing for EB...

USPTO serial 79012912

EB...

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EB...?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medicines, pharmaceutical and veterinary products; medical, biotechnological and/or genetic technology preparations and products for human and animal use for diagnosis and therapy; micro-organisms, cells, cell lines, viruses, nucleotides, plasmids, DNA or RNA sequences, vectors for therapy and diagnosis (for medical use)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 21, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 1, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Sep 9, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance