Drawing for CHATEAU BERNADOTTE

USPTO serial 79012921

CHATEAU BERNADOTTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3183988Status 706Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with CHATEAU BERNADOTTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle L. Zimmermann

Michelle L. Zimmermann Leydig Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. Stetson Ave.Suite 4900CHICAGO, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 202671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Nov 2, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2025REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2025RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 3, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 1, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 1, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 24, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 16, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2012NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2012C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 9, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 1, 2012715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Oct 1, 2012ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 8, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 5, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance