Drawing for ESTOLI

USPTO serial 79012925

ESTOLI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3213592Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 27, 2007
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESTOLI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture of metal, plastic or glass for bathrooms and toilets; mirrors for interior fittings; mirrors for toilet use and for shaving, footstools; structural parts and spare structural parts therewith for the aforementioned goods; plastic handles for bathroom doors and furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
021Accessories for toilets and bathrooms, namely, plastic bath racks; towel holders; towel racks, towel rings, towel bars; bath handles of plastic; bath accessories, namely, cup holders; soap dispensers; soaps dishes; soaps holders; bathroom glass holder not of precious metal; toilet roll tissue holdersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 13, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2014INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 2, 2014INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 4, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 6, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 5, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Dec 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance