Drawing for VIÑA PUNTO ALTO

USPTO serial 79012933

VIÑA PUNTO ALTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3206359Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 6, 2007
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIÑA PUNTO ALTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL CORNMAN

SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE 19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely alcoholic bitters, alcoholic essences, alcoholic punch, prepared cocktails, aperitifs, distilled spirits, eau-de-vie, alcoholic beverages containing fruits, alcoholic fruit extracts, wines, and digestifs, namely brandies and liqueursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2016UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 7, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 7, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 1, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 23, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 28, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 28, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 18, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 10, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance