USPTO serial 79013066
CROWNFIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3272498Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 31, 2007
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROWNFIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria C.H. Lin
MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cereal preparations, namely, breakfast cereals, muesli, cornflakes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2015 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |