Drawing for OAKWOOD

USPTO serial 79013067

OAKWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAKWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIA C.H. LIN

MARIA CH LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTRNEW YORK, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Preserved, cooked and dried fruits and vegetables; fruit and vegetable preserves; picklesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 27, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 31, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 25, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 5, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 1, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance