Drawing for INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH .NET

USPTO serial 79013076

INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH .NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3183990Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INDUSTRIAL STRENGTH .NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lerner

MARK LERNER SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE & BURKE LLP230 PARK AVE STE 1130NEW YORK, NY 10169UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041education and training services, namely, instructor led courses, e-learning courses, and online courses, all in the field of enterprise scale developmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 1, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 30, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Sep 30, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 18, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 10, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 2, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 12, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 12, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 7, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jun 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jun 10, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 28, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance