Drawing for CONTINENTAL ROAST

USPTO serial 79013077

CONTINENTAL ROAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONTINENTAL ROAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, roast and ground coffee, instant coffee, pulverised coffee, freeze-dried coffee and granulated coffeeSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Dec 4, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 6, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 6, 2007CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED
Apr 19, 2007LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 29, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 29, 2007CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 8, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 5, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 1, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 10, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 31, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Dec 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance