USPTO serial 79013225
BEKAERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220242Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BEKAERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES E. SHLESINGER
JAMES E. SHLESINGER FRESH IP PLC11710 PLAZA AMERICA DR., SUITE 2000RESTON, VA 20190United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | INSTALLATIONS FOR HEATING, DRYING AND BURNING, NAMELY, GAS BURNERS FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE; GAS BURNERS ALL FOR DOMESTIC, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USE, NAMELY, ROUND BURNERS USED IN CONVENTIONAL GAS APPLIANCES, OVAL BURNERS DESIGNED TO OPERATE WITHOUT FAN ASSISTANCE OR SECONDARY AIR CONTROL, CYLINDRICAL BURNERS USED FOR DIRECT FIRED STORAGE WATER-HEATERS, REFRACTORY STEEL CYLINDRICAL BURNERS FOR USE IN HIGH EFFICIENCY/CONDENSING RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES, FLAT PRE-MIXED BURNERS DESIGNED TO OPERATE IN HIGH EFFICIENCY/CONDENSING BOILER APPLIANCES, ROUND PRE-MIX BURNERS DESIGNED TO OPERATE IN HIGH EFFICIENCY/CONDENSING BOILER APPLIANCE; GAS DISTRIBUTION BLOCKS FOR GAS BURNERS, NAMELY, MANIFOLDS, INJECTORS, BURNER PLATES AND COMBUSTION CONTROLS FOR INDUSTRIAL BOILERS; GAS BURNERS FOR EFFICIENT AND ENVIRONMENT FRIENDLY BURNING OF WASTE GASES FOR THE OIL, GAS AND PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; GAS INFRA-RED HEATERS AND INFRA-RED BURNERS; GAS BURNERS FOR GAS INSTALLATIONS FOR DOMESTIC USE; GAS BURNERS FOR FURNACE BOILERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; GAS BURNERS FOR HEATING INSTALLATIONS FOR DOMESTIC USE; GAS BURNING INFRA-RED DRYING INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, GAS FIRED INFRA-RED EMITTERS USED IN INDUSTRIAL DRYING UNITS; GAS BURNING INFRA-RED RADIATION APPARATUS USED FOR NON-CONTACT DRYING AND MOISTURE PROFILING IN THE PAPER AND BOARD INDUSTRY; ELECTRICAL INFRA-RED RADIATION APPARATUS USED FOR NON-CONTACT DRYING AND MOISTURE PROFILING IN THE PAPER AND BOARD INDUSTRY; ELECTRICAL INFRA-RED DRYING INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, INFRA-RED DRYING MACHINES FOR USE IN THE PAPER MAKING INDUSTRY; INFRA-RED DRYING INSTALLATIONS, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL INFRA-RED RADIATION APPARATUS USED FOR CURING PAINT, LACQUER, AND VARNISH; BURNERS AND FLARES FOR BURNING REST GASES, BIO-GASES, SUCH AS IN THE OIL, GAS, PETROCHEMICAL AND CHEMICAL INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Apr 21, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 12, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 13, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2012 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |