USPTO serial 79013240
DEEPFLO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3253857Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 19, 2007
- Examiner
- BUSH,KAREN K
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEEPFLO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Engling
Timothy J. Engling Michael Best & Friedrich LLP180 N. Stetson Avenue, Suite 2000Chicago, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Water hoses; non-metal oil hoses; non-metal hoses for commercial marine use; non-metal water and/or oil hoses for industrial and marine use; water and/or oil hoses for deep water applications; non-metal couplings for hoses | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Oil & Marine Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Oil & Marine Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Dunlop Oil & Marine Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named DEEPFLO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 25, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 17, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |