Drawing for PERKALITE

USPTO serial 79013256

PERKALITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3181135Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 5, 2006
Examiner
RINKER, ANTHONY MICHAEL
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERKALITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

Ronald E. Shapiro Shapiro and Silverstein PLLC11350 Random Hills Road, Suite 740FAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations, namely synthetic clay for use in industrySECTION 71 - CANCELLED
019[ Clay Powder for use in Industry ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Feb 12, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 15, 2026DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 15, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 27, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 6, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 8, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Mar 8, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Mar 7, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jul 7, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Apr 28, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 5, 2015REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2015RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Oct 10, 2014INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 7, 2014INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Oct 15, 2013INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 15, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Feb 15, 2013C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Feb 15, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED
Feb 15, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 7, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 28, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 2, 2007ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 11, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jul 6, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 5, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 17, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 18, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 1, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance