USPTO serial 79013347
SVANSØ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3501914Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SVANSØ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY A. SMITH
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ Preserved, dried and cooked fruits; preserved and dried vegetables; processed garlic; preserved, dried and cooked olives; preserved truffles; sun-dried tomatoes and tomato purée; jellies; ] jams; [ marmalade; ] fruit based spreads; [ fruit toppings; fruit preserves; cranberry sauce; applesauce; stewed fruit; edible oils, ] none of the foregoing being frozen foods | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | [ Flour; sauces; tomato sauces; rice; bread; pastry; vinegar, none of the foregoing being frozen foods ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Svansø Food A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Good Food Group A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Good Food Group A/S
- Other trademarks owned by Good Food Group A/S
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SVANSØ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2025 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 8, 2015 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2007 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2007 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |