Drawing for THE PRINCE OF WHISKIES EST. 1801

USPTO serial 79013352

THE PRINCE OF WHISKIES EST. 1801

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3835131Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 17, 2010
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PRINCE OF WHISKIES EST. 1801?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MEYER A. GROSS

Meyer A. Gross Ladas & Parry LLP1040 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10018-3738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY DISTILLED SPIRITS; DISTILLED ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY WHISKY, MALT WHISKY, WHISKY LIQUEURS; BEVERAGES MADE FROM OR CONTAINING WHISKYSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 30, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Dec 30, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 17, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 11, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 17, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 1, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 1, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 27, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 8, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 8, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 7, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Oct 8, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 8, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 8, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 18, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 18, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 31, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 17, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 2, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 13, 2007PC.DPETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED
Jul 13, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 11, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 11, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jul 3, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
May 23, 2007PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED
May 23, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 2, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2006DCPNCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 3, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 17, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jan 14, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jan 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance