Drawing for APOLLO

USPTO serial 79013396

APOLLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APOLLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical mixing machines and concrete mixersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Electric apparatus and instruments as well as weighing measuring, dosing, signalling and checking apparatus and instruments, especially for use in the building industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Building construction; repair; installation servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 9, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 10, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 24, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 23, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 19, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 27, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 14, 2005RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW
Sep 14, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance