USPTO serial 79013420
STIC EXPERT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STIC EXPERT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Chemical and biological products intended for analysis, reactions and dosages and testing, namely, diagnostic testing reagents for human and veterinary medical use | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Apparatus for automated dosing of biological agent for use in the field of medical analysis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DIAGNOSTICA STAGO
- Other trademarks owned by DIAGNOSTICA STAGO
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DIAGNOSTICA-STAGO
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named STIC EXPERT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |