USPTO serial 79013425
SICPASEAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3218175Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SICPASEAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew P. Bridges, Kiran Belur
Andrew P. Bridges, Kiran Belur FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CENTER801 CALIFORNIA STREETMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED SECURITY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PRINTING PAPER, CARDBOARD AND PRODUCTS MADE OF SUCH MATERIAL, NAMELY, PRINTED BANK NOTES, TICKETS, LABELS, BANDEROLS, AND DOCUMENTS; FILMS AND FOILS OF PLASTIC FOR WRAPPING AND PACKAGING; STATIONERY; MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING, NAMELY, PAPER ENVELOPES, PLASTIC OR PAPER BAGS, ENVELOPES AND PAPER POUCHES; PAPER AND CARDBOARD BOXES AND TUBES FOR MERCHANDISE PACKAGING, BLISTER CARDS FOR PACKAGING; PLASTIC BUBBLE PACKS FOR WRAPPING AND PACKAGING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | TREATMENT OF MATERIALS, NAMELY, PRINTING, DIGITAL PRINTING AND MARKING, NAMELY THE APPLICATION OF SECURITY TAGGANTS, MARKINGS, COATINGS, AND COMPOSITIONS FOR READING AND CODING TO IMPEDE COUNTERFEITING | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SICPA HOLDING SA
- Other trademarks owned by SICPA Holding S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SICPA Holding S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SICPA Holding S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SICPASEAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 1, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 6, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |