Drawing for ML HOME COLLECTION

USPTO serial 79013429

ML HOME COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3864290Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 19, 2010
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ML HOME COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cindy L. Caditz

Cindy L. Caditz Christensen O'Connor Johnson Kindness PLLC1420 Fifth Ave.Suite 2800Seattle, WA 98101

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021combsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
024Textiles, namely, textile tablecloths, kitchen linen, kitchen towels, bed linen, bath linen, table linen including coasters, napkins, and placemats; table covers, namely, textile tablecloths; textile wall hangingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
027Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum for covering existing floors; non-textile wall hangingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 5, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 19, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 19, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 19, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 19, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 3, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 1, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 11, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 7, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 28, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 27, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 10, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 20, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance