Drawing for KULINARIA

USPTO serial 79013445

KULINARIA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3162855Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 24, 2006
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KULINARIA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Food preservative compositions, such as sodium ascorbate, caragana, sodium phosphate, and ponceau 4RSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
029Foodstuffs of animal origin, namely, smoked sausages, sausages, smoked bacons, smoked hams, bacons, meat pies, patés, liver sausages, meatballs, hamburgers, lard, gelatin, shashliks, shish kebabs, processed meats, black puddings, headcheese, meat salads, offal salads, smoked fish, salted fish, pickled fish, fish salads, fish fillets, fish chops, fish sticks, fish pastes, meat jellies, tripe, meat stews, offal stews, processed meats, namely, kidneys, roast chicken, roast pork, roast beef, roast sliced meat, roast whole meat; meat; soy-based products, namely, soy smoked sausages, soy hamburgers, soy chops, soy pies, snack foods, namely, fruit based snack foods, soy based snack foods, extruded corn and wheat snacks, beef jerky, beverages used as a milk substitute; vegetable albumin, namely, soy protein for use as a nutritional ingredient in powdered and ready-to-drink beverages; dried vegetables and fruits; canned vegetables, vegetable protein for human consumption, namely, formed and textured protein to be used as an extender or meat substitute, textured vegetable protein for use as meat extenderSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
030Food flavorings; essential oils for food flavorings; seasonings; seasonings from plant extracts; flourSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Mar 20, 2015DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Mar 20, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 2, 2014XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Oct 2, 2014XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 20, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 20, 2013C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jun 20, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 30, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 7, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 28, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 9, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 16, 2005IRRHIRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU
Oct 7, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2005IRRFIRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB
Sep 19, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 17, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance