USPTO serial 79013449
THALIA HEDGE FUND INVESTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3286493Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2007
- Examiner
- BEYER, ELIZABETH L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THALIA HEDGE FUND INVESTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | financial and investments management, financial and investment consultancy, financial services, namely, a total portfolio offering for high net worth clients consisting of both separate accounts and mutual funds for equity and fixed income investments, insurance consultancy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 5, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 5, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |