USPTO serial 79013612
VONROLL HYDROPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VONROLL HYDROPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jerry S. Goldman,
B&P TAX & LEGAL AGTALSTRASSE 82, CH-8022 ZüRICHSWITZERLANDGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Data compilation and systematization in a central database; advertising; commercial business management; corporate administration; office functions, professional business consulting, business organization and management consulting, market research (marketing); consulting in the field of supply services for third parties (procurement of goods and services for other companies) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Providing maintenance and consulting services for gas and liquid leakage detection in pipe systems; construction; repair; installation services | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting services in the field of electronic commercial transaction; software installation, maintenance of computer software, updating of computer software databases; rental and leasing of access time to data networks and databases (computer services) free of charge; scientific and technological services and related research and design services; industrial analysis and research services, in particular for gas and liquid leakage detection in pipe systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by vonRoll infratec ag
- Other trademarks owned by vonRoll infratec (investment) ag
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VONROLL HYDROPORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |