Drawing for ACTIVE EYEWEAR BY RODENSTOCK

USPTO serial 79013630

ACTIVE EYEWEAR BY RODENSTOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACTIVE EYEWEAR BY RODENSTOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, especially sport spectacles, spectacle frames, spectacle lenses, blanks (spectacle lenses finished on one side), spectacle accessories (included in this class)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Games, toys; gymnastic and sporting articles (not included in other classes)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 25, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 24, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Oct 12, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 17, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 16, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2006CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 14, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance