USPTO serial 79013635
BOULE DE NEIGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3294164Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2007
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BOULE DE NEIGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jamie E. Sternberg
Jamie E. Sternberg Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church StreetFloor 22Hartford, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | PULLOVERS, GLOVES, CARDIGANS, JERSEYS, NECKWEAR, SWEATERS, SOCKS, STOCKINGS, TIGHTS, TROUSERS, LEGGINGS, SKIRTS, JACKETS, JERKINS, SHIRTS, VESTS, WAISTCOATS, JUMPERS, TRACK SUITS, PANTS, SHORTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEAT-SHIRTS, SUITS AND DRESSES, OVERCOATS, COATS, RAINCOATS, SUSPENDERS, UNDERWEAR, BEACHWEAR, SHOES, BOOTS, BELTS, FOULARDS, SCARVES, ALL OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED ITEMS OF CLOTHING EXCLUSIVELY FOR ADULTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2026 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2007 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PGOA | PETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 7, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |