Drawing for PEZ MINIMINT

USPTO serial 79013657

PEZ MINIMINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PEZ MINIMINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Packaging containers made of plastic, namely boxes for confectionery and boxes with dispensing function for sweetmeats, pastilles and drageesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
030Confectionery, sweetmeats, especially compressed sugar; dextrose and compressed dextrose for purposes of nourishment; refreshment pastilles and candy; cough pastilles and drops not for medical purposes; chewing-gum dragees; pastilles and dragees also sugar-free, but not for medical purposesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 16, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 5, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jun 22, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
May 31, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
May 29, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 22, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 22, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 20, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Oct 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance