Drawing for TENNESSEE

USPTO serial 79013750

TENNESSEE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TENNESSEE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Maria C.H. Lin

MARIA C H LIN MORGAN & FINNEGAN LLP3 WORLD FINANCIAL CTR, NY 10281-2101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cakes and pastriesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2010DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 23, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 22, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 6, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 5, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Aug 22, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 22, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 24, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 8, 2005SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance