USPTO serial 79013752
FUHR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3117397Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 18, 2006
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with FUHR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
24579 Heiligenhaus, DE
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT S. BRODER
ROBERT S. BRODER Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [ FITTINGS, NAMELY, SECURITY RING-SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; ] METAL LOCKS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; METAL HANDLES, FASTENERS, NAMELY, METAL LOCKING BARS, METAL BOLTS, METAL SHOOT BOLTS, METAL LOCKING BOLTS, METAL DOORS BOLTS; COMPONENTS OF ALL ABOVEMENTIONED GOODS PRIMARILY OF METAL AND ALSO IN COMBINATION WITH PLASTIC | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ FITTINGS, NAMELY, NON-METAL SECURITY FITTINGS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; NON-METAL LOCKS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; NON-METAL HANDLES, FASTENERS, NAMELY, NON-METAL LOCKING BARS, NON-METAL BOLTS, NON-METAL SHOOT BOLTS, NON-METAL LOCKING BOLTS, NON-METAL DOORS BOLTS; COMPONENTS OF ALL ABOVEMENTIONED GOODS PRIMARILY OF PLASTIC AND ALSO IN COMBINATION WITH METAL ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [ TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY CONCERNING FITTINGS, NAMELY, SECURITY RING-SHAPED FITTINGS OF METAL FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; METAL LOCKS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; METAL HANDLES, FASTENERS, NAMELY, METAL LOCKING BARS, METAL BOLTS, METAL SHOOT BOLTS, METAL LOCKING BOLTS, METAL DOORS BOLTS; TECHNICAL CONSULTANCY CONCERNING FITTINGS, NAMELY, NON-METAL SECURITY FITTINGS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; NON-METAL LOCKS FOR DOORS, GATES AND WINDOWS; NON-METAL HANDLES, FASTENERS, NAMELY, NON-METAL LOCKING BARS, NON-METAL BOLTS, NON-METAL SHOOT BOLTS, NON-METAL LOCKING BOLTS, NON-METAL DOORS BOLTS; TECHNICAL PLANNING, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DESIGN FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED PRODUCTS FOR OTHERS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Carl Fuhr GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FUHR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2017 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 9, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2014 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2014 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2012 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |