USPTO serial 79013790
Serial No. 79013790
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3196950Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 79013790?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | games and playthings, namely toy building blocks and construction sets, in particular, toy construction sets of stone | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Anker Steinbaukasten GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Anker Steinbaukasten GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Anker Steinbaukasten GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Ankerstein GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 26, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 20, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 13, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | IRRF | IRREGULARITY ON REFUSAL FROM IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |