Drawing for CHARLEMAGNE

USPTO serial 79013792

CHARLEMAGNE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARLEMAGNE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Precious metals and their alloys, namely gold and silver; jewelry; precious stones; and horological and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Feb 5, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 10, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
May 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2008NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 10, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Feb 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Feb 10, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Feb 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance