Drawing for OSCARTIELLE

USPTO serial 79013823

OSCARTIELLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OSCARTIELLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Shop furniture, counters and display cabinets, racks (furniture) of metal and not of metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2015DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 2, 2015DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 7, 2007FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2007OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2007OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2005RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2005RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Oct 15, 2005RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 14, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2005LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance